原创！剑17 test 3 高文文（8分范文）

十年2017

来历：知乎
题目：
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

写作框架：
Introduction: Introduce the topic of the essay and the two sides of the debate.
Arguments in favor of requiring professionals to work in their home countries: Explain the reasons why some people believe that professionals should be required to work in the country where they received their training, such as ensuring a sufficient number of trained professionals and meeting the needs of the population.
Arguments in favor of allowing professionals to work wherever they wish: Explain the reasons why others believe that professionals should be free to work in another country if they wish, such as seeking out the best job opportunities and negotiating the highest salaries.
Counterarguments and rebuttals: Address potential counterarguments and provide rebuttals to the opposing side's points.
Conclusion: Summarize the main points of the essay and give your own opinion on the issue.

范文：
Introduction:
The debate over whether professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they received their training or be allowed to work in another country if they wish is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides.
Arguments in favor of requiring professionals to work in their home countries:
One argument in favor of requiring professionals to work in their home countries is that it ensures that these countries have a sufficient number of trained professionals to meet the needs of their populations. This is especially important in countries where there are shortages of certain types of professionals, such as doctors in rural areas or engineers in developing countries. By requiring professionals to work in their home countries, governments can help to alleviate these shortages and ensure that all citizens have access to the healthcare and other services they need.
Arguments in favor of allowing professionals to work wherever they wish:
On the other hand, others argue that professionals should be free to work wherever they wish because it allows them to seek out the best job opportunities and the highest salaries. This can be particularly beneficial for professionals who are highly trained and in high demand, as it allows them to negotiate the best terms for their employment. In addition, allowing professionals to work wherever they wish can also lead to the exchange of knowledge and ideas between countries, which can ultimately benefit everyone.
Counterarguments and rebuttals:
One counterargument to the idea of allowing professionals to work wherever they wish is that it could lead to a brain drain, with highly trained professionals leaving their home countries in search of better opportunities elsewhere. However, this can be mitigated through the use of programs that encourage professionals to return to their home countries after working abroad for a certain period of time, or through the implementation of policies that require professionals to give back to their home countries in some way, such as by working in underserved areas or participating in professional development programs.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both arguments have valid points and there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the issue of whether professionals should be required to work in their home countries. The decision on whether to require professionals to work in their home countries should be based on a variety of factors, including the needs of the population, the availability of trained professionals, and the potential benefits of allowing professionals to work wherever they wish.

原文地址：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/596268409
免责声明：本帖内容由机械人自动收集于互联网，如加害了您的权益，请联系我们【E-Mail:cb@yoyodoc.com】 我们会实时删除侵权内容，给您带来未便，深感歉意！