Argument范文赏析

小李ddx

来历：知乎



明天给大师赏析一篇GRE官方题库argument题目，关于具体怎样写一篇argument，有哪些需要值得留意的地方，可以先去参考参考下面这篇文章
GRE作文官方题库ARGUMENT题目：
The president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, made the following recommendation to the college's governing committee:
"We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumni who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all-female, therefore, will improve morale among students and convince alumni to keep supporting the college financially."
满分范文赏析
In this memo Grove College's administration recommends preserving its tradition of admitting only female students. The administration admits that most faculty members are in favor of a co-educational policy but the administration defends its recommendation by citing a student government survey in which 80% of student respondents and more than 50% of alumni respondents reported that they favor the current policy. The administration reasons that preserving the status quo would improve student morale and help ensure continued alumni donations to Grove. While the argument seems sensible, it is flawed in several critical respects.
【此段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument开首段结构，即：C – E - F的开首结构，首句概括原文的C(Conclusion)。接下来的一句话概括了原文为了支持他的结论所援用的E(Evidence)。最初尾句中给出开首段到正文段的过渡句，指出原文在逻辑上存在F(Flaw)。
【此段功用】
本段作为Argument开首段，具体功用就在倡议进犯。首先，概括原文的结论：Grove College(简称G)保举表持只登科女门生的传统。接下来别离罗列了原文为了支持这个结论援用的证据：survey表白80%的门生介入者以及50%的校友介入者支持现在的政策，administration以为保持现状可以提升门生士气并获得校友的延续捐助，论据的归纳用于铺垫出正文段的具体进犯。最初点出原文存在逻辑毛病，引出前面的分析。
First, the statistical reliability of the survey itself comes into question. If a disproportionate number of the survey's respondents were newer students, then the survey results would distort the student body's opinion as a group. With respect to the alumni survey, perhaps fewer alumni who donate substantial sums to Grove responded to the survey than other alumni did. If so, then the survey results would distort the comparison between the total amounts of future donations. Besides, the memo provides no information about what percentage of Grove's students and alumni responded to the surveys.
【此段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第一个逻辑毛病的毛病范例和原文出错位置，接下来给出公道的来由和他因来辩驳原文。
【此段功用】
本段作为正文第一段，进犯文章犯的首要逻辑毛病：观察类毛病。作者以为原文所援用的观察存在疑问。进一步，作者提出几种能够性来质疑原文中的观察。门生样本能够是disproportion的，致使观察成果不能反应门生的整体情况;alumni观察获得的答复能够很少来自会捐钱的校友。同时，作者还指出，原文中没有提到student和alumni观察的比例。
Secondly, the administration hastily assumes that Grove's alumni, as a group, would be less inclined to donate money if Grove begins admitting male students. This aspect of Grove's admission policy is only one of many factors that might affect alumni donations. For example, since Grove's faculty are generally in favor of changing the policy, perhaps the change would improve faculty moral and therefore the quality of instruction would increase. Perhaps, in the case of overall academic improvement (which could hypothetically occur as a result of the change) alumni would be even more included to offer financial support. So, if the particular alumni who are in a position to make the largest contributions are presented with an argument that establishes a link between faculty morale and overall improvement, an increase in donations by these individuals could occur.
【此段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第二个逻辑毛病的毛病范例和原文出错位置，接下来给出公道的来由和他因来辩驳原文。
【此段功用】
本段作为正文第二段，进犯文章犯的首要逻辑毛病：毛病因果。作者以为原文中“假如招收男门生，校友不偏向于捐钱”这一结论是毫无逻辑的，由于这只是G黉舍政策中的一条。进一步，作者提出其他能够性来辩驳原文中的结论，G黉舍的教工支持鼎新，鼎新会使教工士气进步并进步讲授质量。能够整体讲授质量的进步会使alumni更偏向于捐钱。
Finally, the administration's argument that student morale would improve under the status quo is logically unsound in two respects. First, the administration provides no reason why morale would improve, as opposed to remaining at its current level, if the status quo is simply maintained. Second, the administration cannot really predict how the morale of the student body would be affected by a policy change.
【此段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即：概括第三个逻辑毛病的毛病范例和原文出错位置，接下来给出公道的来由和他因来辩驳原文。
【此段功用】
本段作为正文第三段，进犯文章犯的首要逻辑毛病：毛病因果。作者以为原文中“门生的士气会由于政策的稳定而进步”这一结论是不正确的。作者提出了两个缘由：首先administration没有说明致使士气上升或下降的缘由。其次，administration没有说明鼎新对门生士气发生的影响。
最初给大师安利一波福利，看图，想要更多范文的朋友留言支付就行了啦！！！








原文地址：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/348521098
免责声明：
1、文章部分图片源于收集，均为表示图；
2、一切文章、图片、音频视频文件等材料版权归版权一切人一切；
3、因非原创文章及图片等内容没法和版权者联系，如原作者或编辑以为作品不宜上网供阅读，或不应无偿利用，请实时告诉我们，以敏捷采纳适当办法，避免给双方形成不需要的经济损失；
4、本页面内容由爬虫法式自动收集于互联网，如无意中加害了媒体或小我的常识产权，请电邮【E-Mail:cb@yoyodoc.com】告之，我们将于24小时内删除。

付佳琦

蜜斯姐，求argument的范文！

温室小书生室d

求范文！！！

123457730

求范文！！感谢！