20230204雅思写作范文一枚~

贾华森

来历：知乎



年后第一次考试的写作题目是2013年的题目重现，也是Panda昔时起头刚起头备课就预备到的题目之一，真是没想到一会儿就曩昔十年了......
2013年出了很多高难度题目，这道题目是中等难度，不算是太坑人~


20230204
Some people think they have the right to use as much fresh water as they want, while others believe that governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Brainstorming部分：

• 有些人感觉有自在，是由于他们付得起价格~
  
• 有的人感觉应当限制，是由于他们斟酌到环保和可延续成长的题目~
  

• 我的概念是肆意利用or浪费水必定是不道德的，但也不意味着便可以引入政府来严酷治理。更好的方式就是用经济手段去调理，利用门路水价来控制人们对水的需求~
  

<hr/>

Sample：


Some people believe that they are entitled to consume as much fresh water as they want, but others believe that governments should impose restrictions on the use of fresh water as it is a finite resource.


On the one hand, those who approve of using fresh water freely may believe that they can afford the expenses no matter how much fresh water they use. Most laws protect citizens’ property rights, and this implies that after citizens purchase some fresh water, they acquire the ownership of the fresh water they pay for, as well as the right to decide how to use it. Even if some people purchase fresh water and then pour it directly, they do not violate laws. Therefore, in theory, people can consume as much fresh water as they want as long as they pay for their behavior.

On the other hand, people who urge governments to regulate the use of fresh water may realize the importance of sustainability issues. Fresh water is a typically scarce resource on the earth, and once it runs out, it may be difficult for humans to acquire it from other sources, especially considering that current desalination technology may not produce fresh water on a large scale. In such a context, some people may hope governments to control the use of fresh water because governments can make use of legislative power to reduce fresh water consumption. Then, humans may have more time to find new sources of fresh water or update desalination technology before fresh water resources are exhausted.

From my perspective, it is unethical for individuals to excessively consume fresh water, but this does not necessarily mean that governments can limit people’s freedom to use fresh water in daily life. A better solution is to reduce unnecessary fresh water waste by adopting a ladder pricing strategy, which allows governments to charge users different prices based on the amount of fresh water they consume. A prerequisite is that governments need to identify how much, on average, fresh water is sufficient for a household’s everyday life in their regions, and then if the amount of fresh water consumed by some people surpasses the line, they will have to pay a much higher price for the excessive water they used. This, to a certain degree, will discourage those unethical ones from arbitrarily wasting fresh water without restricting other people’s ordinary use of fresh water.



若有定见，接待留言，接待捉虫~~~




原文地址：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/604052414
免责声明：
1、文章部分图片源于收集，均为表示图；
2、一切文章、图片、音频视频文件等材料版权归版权一切人一切；
3、因非原创文章及图片等内容没法和版权者联系，如原作者或编辑以为作品不宜上网供阅读，或不应无偿利用，请实时告诉我们，以敏捷采纳适当办法，避免给双方形成不需要的经济损失；
4、本页面内容由爬虫法式自动收集于互联网，如无意中加害了媒体或小我的常识产权，请电邮【E-Mail:cb@yoyodoc.com】告之，我们将于24小时内删除。